I went for a pre-operative consultation last week at the hospital and was asked by the nurse how I would define my religion ? I had to think about this but eventually plumped for the epithet “Christian” I wanted to say follower of Jesus and then go on to explain this more fully. I felt embarrassed by the designation Christian because it has become an offensive term in some quarters and its meaning has so often been diluted. The term “evangelical” similarly has many negative connotations, such as fundamentalist, bigoted, dogmatic, whacko . Who do we allow to define us? Which voices do we listen to? How come words are vested with such power to bless or curse ?
I don’t like labels as they can become like prison cells- very confining! . If you had asked me ten years ago how I would describe my faith I would have said I was a charismatic evangelical Christian , because that was the appellation given to my church tradition. Now I do not want to be tied down by such definitions, restricted by belonging to a particular denomination .”Oh you belong to the Vineyard don’t you and they believe such and such” No, thank-you, that does not define the totality of my life and faith . In no way am I being dismissive of the particular tribe I belong to, but I value insight and practice from other traditions.
But surely it’s only a descriptive term that helps people to communicate, to get a handle on things.? There in lies the problem, people want to fit me into a particular mould and I want to break out of this . I don’t want to be branded like specific commodities. I range over a broader canvas and my theological thinking gives me wings to fly .On the other hand, I cannot escape my heritage, I’m thankful for it , I was brought up in a certain family but I refuse to be limited by it. I do still have to honour my particular roots, but I have choices. . People’s stickers will not stick any longer, because I am beginning to change and I am feeling more confident about challenging these labels You continuously get asked where do you fit in, and I’m content not to have a fixed answer .
A label can provide a lot of comfort and re-assurance, build confidence, offer certainty. Labels are also social constructs, coming from a particular perspective, and culture, so are subject to differing interpretations. It is the freighting of these labels with prejudicial and prescriptive meanings that I object to. I like the term post-evangelical, it has a certain affinity for me but that in itself engenders negative criticism – liberal, relativist, unbeliever. I deplore this! Words need to be reclaimed and de-toxed of any negative connotations. Labels come attached to a certain amount of baggage and it is this baggage which I am most uncomfortable with. But none of us comes from a neutral position and we have to be honest about what we bring to our faith and life commitment.
I aspire to be a faithful disciple of Jesus, come from an evangelical, charismatic tradition and attend a Vineyard Church. I am a companion in the Society of St Francis , a devoted husband to Liz and a soon to be registered Social worker. That is a description, not a label that attempts to tie me down, to pigeon- hole me. It is a provisional statement open to change. and subject to further candour.
Recent Comments